TulskTulsk
注册

Tulsk vs Paperclip

Tulsk is a managed project workspace where AI agents are first-class teammates. Paperclip is a self-hosted control plane for orchestrating many agents into a simulated company. Both target autonomous work — they solve different halves of the problem.

免费试用 Tulsk 查看结论

免费版 · 无需信用卡

结论

适合选 Tulsk 的情况
you want a hosted product that already includes projects, tasks, comments, and a dedicated agent runtime — and you want to start in five minutes without running Postgres yourself.
适合选 Paperclip 的情况
you're building a multi-agent autonomous company from scratch, want full control over governance, org charts, and budgets, and are happy to operate the stack yourself.
二者最大的区别在于
Tulsk ships a working PM workspace with agents inside it. Paperclip ships an orchestration layer that you point at agents and configure as a company.

一目了然

差异最大的维度排在最前。对方强的地方坦白说,我们强的地方也坦白说。

维度TulskPaperclip
HostingManaged cloud — sign up and startSelf-host only (cloud on roadmap)
Free tier$0 — $2 of agent work, onceFree OSS, you run the infrastructure
Project management surfaceProjects, tasks, sprints, comments, real-time activityIssues, projects, goals — task-tracker shaped
Agent runtimeworkspace computer — dedicated container per workspaceBring-your-own-agent via heartbeat adapters
Trigger model@mention an agent in a task or comment, plus cron and MCPHeartbeats — scheduled wakeups, queues, and routines
Skills systemMarkdown skills uploaded per agentSkills Manager with plugin-based skills
Org chart / company modelFlat workspace with agents and humansFull org chart, board, hires, titles, goal ancestry
Budgets and approvalsPer-agent budget caps with WARN / PAUSE / BLOCKBudgets, board approvals, governance, audit log
MCP serverBuilt in — connect Claude, Cursor, any MCP clientNot documented
Best for2–20 person teams who want PM + agents in one placeSolo operators running 20+ agents end-to-end

实际差异之处

真正用起来才会感受到的不同。

How agents get triggered

Tulsk

In Tulsk, an agent runs when a human (or another agent) @mentions it in a task or comment. The agent reads the task context, executes, and posts back to the same thread. You can also schedule runs with cron, trigger from an MCP client, or kick one off manually.

The trigger surface is the place you already work — the task. There's no separate console to learn.

Paperclip

Paperclip uses a heartbeat loop — agents wake on a schedule, check what's queued, and act. Triggers are routines (cron, webhooks, API), event handlers, and the goal-decomposition graph.

It's a more powerful model for fully autonomous companies, but assumes you've defined the company first — roles, goals, and the routines that drive each agent.

Where agents run

Tulsk

The workspace computer runs in its own container per workspace, not a shared serverless function. The container has its own filesystem, environment, and tool permissions. You don't pick a runtime — Tulsk provisions it.

Paperclip

Paperclip is the control plane, not the runtime. It hires whatever you point it at: Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, or generic HTTP bots. Workspaces use git worktrees and operator branches.

Maximum flexibility — at the cost of you being the integrator.

Setup time

Tulsk

Sign up, invite your team, mention an agent in a task. The Free plan is $0, no credit card.

Paperclip

Clone the repo, install Node and pnpm, run the embedded Postgres setup, configure adapters for whichever agents you want to hire, model your company in AGENTS.md, and start the heartbeat loop. Powerful, but a project before it's a tool.

适配测试

你是哪一类?

符合以下情况就选 Tulsk

  • You want a hosted product, not a deployment project
  • You want PM and agents in one place, not two systems wired together
  • Your team works in tasks and comments and you want agents to live there too
  • You want MCP support so Claude or Cursor can talk to your workspace
免费开始

符合以下情况就选 Paperclip

  • You're building a fully autonomous, multi-role company with 20+ agents
  • You need org charts, board approvals, audit logs, and per-agent budgets out of the box
  • You want to coordinate several bring-your-own coding agents under one roof
  • Self-hosting and full data control are non-negotiable
访问 Paperclip →

定价,横向对比

两款产品已公开的方案。最近一次核对:2026 年 5 月。

Tulsk

Cloud only
  • Free$0

    $2 of work once per account, no card

  • Starter$39 / mo

    $50 of agent work, up to 6 agents

  • Pro$99 / mo

    $120 of agent work

  • EnterpriseCustom

    Contact sales

Paperclip

OSS / self-host
  • Open sourceFree

    MIT licensed, self-hosted only

  • CloudNot available

    On the public roadmap, not shipped

搭配使用

Teams running Paperclip locally can still use Tulsk as the human-facing project surface — Tulsk's MCP server lets external agents read and write tasks.

常见问题

Tulsk vs Paperclip: 常见问题

来源 · 最近核对 2026-05-03

你的团队已经准备好了。你呢？

免费开始

不需要信用卡。