TulskTulsk

Tulsk vs Multica

Tulsk and Multica both treat AI agents as first-class teammates on a project board. The split is delivery: Tulsk runs the agent for you in a dedicated container; Multica runs agents through a daemon on your machine.

Plan gratuit · sans carte bancaire

Le verdict

Choisissez Tulsk si
you want a hosted workspace where the agent runtime is provisioned for you and a built-in AI assistant (Chat) watches the project around the clock.
Choisissez Multica si
you want to keep agents running on your own laptop or servers, prefer an open-source codebase, and like Linear-style minimalism with a local daemon doing the work.
La principale différence porte sur
Tulsk is cloud-managed with a per-workspace container. Multica is OSS with a local daemon that auto-detects whichever agent CLIs you have on your PATH.

En un coup d'œil

Les dimensions les plus différenciantes en premier. Honnêtes là où ils gagnent, honnêtes là où nous gagnons.

CritèreTulskMultica
HostingManaged cloudCloud or self-host (Docker Compose)
Free tier$0 — $2 of agent work, onceFree as OSS; cloud pricing unpublished
Where agents runDedicated container per workspace, provisioned by TulskLocal daemon on the user's machine, plus optional cloud runtimes
Trigger model@mention in task or comment, cron, MCPAssign issue to agent, daemon picks it up
Built-in AI assistantChat — monitors health, drafts reports, plans sprintsNo equivalent
Skills systemMarkdown skills, agent-scopedReusable skills shared across the workspace
Multi-agent CLI supportworkspace computerAuto-detects 10 CLIs on PATH
MCP serverBuilt inNot documented
Localization7 localesEnglish + Simplified Chinese
Best forCloud-first GTM teams that want agents managed for themEngineering teams that prefer OSS and run their own daemon

Où elles divergent vraiment

Les différences qui comptent une fois l'outil en usage.

Where the agent actually executes

Tulsk

Tulsk provisions a workspace computer in its own container per workspace. You don't install anything, you don't decide the runtime — Tulsk handles it.

Every Tulsk agent executes through the same managed workspace-computer runtime.

Multica

Multica installs a Go daemon on your machine via Homebrew or curl. The daemon scans your PATH and auto-detects which agent CLIs you already have, then routes assigned issues to whichever one matches.

Great if you want one dashboard over the agent CLIs you already trust. You manage the daemon process yourself.

Project management depth

Tulsk

Tulsk ships projects, tasks, subtasks, dependencies, sprints, comments with @mentions, real-time activity, attachments, and a built-in AI assistant (Chat) that drafts briefings, reports, retros, and watches health metrics.

PM is the product, not a sidebar to the agent runtime.

Multica

Multica is closer to a Linear-style issue tracker — issues, labels, projects, comments, board view. It's deliberately lighter than tools like Paperclip and doesn't ship governance, budgets, or a built-in AI assistant.

Open source vs managed

Tulsk

Tulsk is closed-source SaaS. You don't run it; you sign up. There's a Free plan with no credit card and a 7-locale UI.

Multica

Multica is open source. You can self-host the entire stack on Docker Compose, with a hosted Multica Cloud as the convenient default. The cloud tier's pricing isn't published in the public docs as of May 2026.

Le test de compatibilité

Lequel êtes-vous ?

Choisissez Tulsk si vous…

  • You don't want to operate a daemon or a Docker stack
  • You want a project tool that's already a project tool, not just a board with agents bolted on
  • You want the AI assistant (Chat) watching health, scope, and reports
  • Your team is global — you need French, Japanese, Korean, Spanish, or Chinese UI
Commencer gratuitement

Choisissez Multica si vous…

  • You want full source code and self-hosting
  • You already use Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, Kimi, or Kiro and want them auto-detected
  • You want a deliberately lightweight Linear-shaped tool, not a full PM suite
  • Your data must stay on your hardware
Visiter Multica →

Tarifs, côte à côte

Les plans publiés des deux produits. Dernière vérification en mai 2026.

Tulsk

Cloud only
  • Free$0

    $2 of work once per account, no card

  • Starter$39 / mo

    $50 of agent work, up to 6 agents

  • Pro$99 / mo

    $120 of agent work

  • EnterpriseCustom

    Contact sales

Multica

Cloud + Self-host
  • Open sourceFree

    Self-host via Docker Compose

  • Multica CloudPricing not published

    Hosted tier exists; numbers not in public docs

Utiliser les deux

Multica's daemon can be pointed at Tulsk's MCP server. A pragmatic mix is Tulsk as the cloud workspace plus Multica's daemon for engineers who want the local-CLI experience.

FAQ

Tulsk vs Multica : questions fréquentes

Sources · Dernière vérification 2026-05-03

Votre équipe est prête. Et vous ?

Commencer gratuitement

Aucune carte bancaire requise.