Devin is an autonomous coder. Tulsk is a project workspace where agents live next to your tasks. They aren't the same product — and that's the most useful thing to know before choosing.
Free plan · no credit card
The most differentiating dimensions first. Honest where they win, honest where we win.
| Dimension | Tulsk | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Project workspace + agents | Autonomous coding agent |
| Free tier | $0, 2 seats, 50 agent runs / mo | Free, limited Devin usage |
| Cheapest paid | $7 per extra seat / mo | $20 / mo (Pro) |
| Project management surface | Projects, tasks, sprints, comments, activity feed | None — Devin lives next to your tracker |
| Where agents run | Dedicated container per workspace (OpenClaw) | Devin runs in its own VM per session |
| Pricing model | Per seat + monthly run quota | Per seat + ACU compute (~$2.25/ACU; 1 ACU ≈ 15 min) |
| What the agent does | Research, writing, web search, ops, code, anything skilled | Engineering work — migrations, fixes, PRs |
| MCP server | Built in | Not the same — uses its own integrations |
| Self-host / on-prem | Cloud only (Enterprise VPC) | Cloud only (Enterprise VPC) |
| Best for | Cross-function startup teams that want agents everywhere | Engineering teams delegating code work |
The differences that matter once you start using either tool.
Tulsk is a project tool. You make a workspace, you create tasks, you @mention agents, they execute. The agent's job description is whatever skills you teach it — research, writing, web search, code, anything.
Devin is a coder, not a PM tool. You give it a ticket and it ships a PR. It plugs into Linear, Jira, Slack, GitHub — but it doesn't replace any of them. It's a teammate, not a workspace.
Tulsk meters by agent runs per month: 50 on Free, 500 on Pro. The seat price is $7 per extra seat. No surprise compute meter.
Devin meters by ACU — Agent Compute Units. 1 ACU is roughly 15 minutes of active autonomous work and includes the VM + model inference + networking. Overages run around $2.25 per ACU on Core, $2 on Team. Long-running work can compound costs beyond the listed monthly fee.
Tulsk replaces your project tool — it's where your team and your agents both live. The 50/500 run quota covers normal small-team usage.
Devin doesn't replace anything. You keep your tracker. You assign tickets to Devin from Linear or Jira and Devin ships PRs against your repo. If your bottleneck is engineering throughput, that's the right shape.
Which one are you?
Both products' published plans. Last verified May 2026.
2 seats, 50 agent runs / mo
2 base seats, 500 agent runs / mo
Contact sales
Limited Devin usage, Devin Review, DeepWiki
Devin + Windsurf IDE quota
Higher quotas
Centralized billing, admin analytics
SSO, VPC option
Tulsk and Devin can coexist — Devin handles deep engineering work, Tulsk handles the rest of the company. Both connect via MCP and standard integrations.
Tulsk vs Devin: common questions
Sources · Last verified 2026-05-03
No credit card required.
